| Architecture | |||||
| Bachelor | Length of the Programme: 4 | Number of Credits: 240 | TR-NQF-HE: Level 6 | QF-EHEA: First Cycle | EQF: Level 6 |
| School/Faculty/Institute | Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture | ||||
| Course Code | ARC 202 | ||||
| Course Title in English | Architectural Design IV | ||||
| Course Title in Turkish | Mimari Tasarım IV | ||||
| Language of Instruction | EN | ||||
| Type of Course | Project | ||||
| Level of Course | Intermediate | ||||
| Semester | Spring | ||||
| Contact Hours per Week |
|
||||
| Estimated Student Workload | 858 hours per semester | ||||
| Number of Credits | 12 ECTS | ||||
| Grading Mode | Standard Letter Grade | ||||
| Pre-requisites |
ARC 201 - Architectural Design III |
||||
| Co-requisites | None | ||||
| Expected Prior Knowledge | Three semesters of studio work | ||||
| Registration Restrictions | Only Undergraduate Students | ||||
| Overall Educational Objective | To learn to translate a functional program that contains public and private components into an architectural system, taking technological and contextual aspects into consideration. | ||||
| Course Description | Architectural Design IV is a studio course, designed to curate a learning environment, featuring an architectural design project of public and private use in a relatively complex context. The defining elements of the context might include social, physical, historical or political patterns. A further feature is the relatively high fidelity of building technology component in the overall architecture, emergent in the configuration and detailing of the structural system. The studio work is supported by the accompanying Architectural Technology 3 course, where learners are supplied with consultancy on their structural systems and materials. Digital modelling platforms are put in use in the design process, moving beyond their previous role as representation components for presentations. The studio groups use a common term to start their analysis work. Learners work as teams and individually respectively in the analysis and the main phases, presenting their work to a critical discussion environment in the mid-term and final pin-up sessions. |
Course Learning Outcomes and CompetencesUpon successful completion of the course, the learner is expected to be able to:1) 1. use digital representation techniques of architectural design; 2) 2. reflect on site-specific social, cultural and environmental factors into the design process; 3) 3. select and integrate structural systems into the architectural design. |
| Program Learning Outcomes/Course Learning Outcomes | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1) An ability to conceptualize, develop, and implement creative and innovative design solutions across varying scales and complexities, integrating both theoretical and practical aspects of architectural services. | |||
| 2) An ability of evaluating, applying, and synthesizing technical, aesthetic, and ethical dimensions of architectural knowledge with a scientific and critical approach, ensuring feasible and sustainable outcomes. | |||
| 3) A competence to analyze historical, cultural, and theoretical contexts of architectural works and environments while fostering an intellectual perspective for critical engagement with global and local issues. | |||
| 4) A skill in effectively utilizing analog and digital tools, including freehand sketches, digital modeling, and graphical representation techniques, to clearly articulate architectural ideas and processes to a range of audiences. | |||
| 5) An awareness of and commitment to ethical principles and professional responsibilities by addressing societal needs, promoting environmental sustainability, respecting cultural diversity. | |||
| 6) An ability to conduct rigorous research, analyze and synthesize data, and apply theories, methods, and intellectual frameworks on design subjects. | |||
| 7) A commitment to collaborate effectively in interdisciplinary and multicultural environments, showcasing leadership and coordinating efforts among professionals involved in shaping the built environment. |
| N None | S Supportive | H Highly Related |
| Program Outcomes and Competences | Level | Assessed by | |
| 1) | An ability to conceptualize, develop, and implement creative and innovative design solutions across varying scales and complexities, integrating both theoretical and practical aspects of architectural services. | H | Project |
| 2) | An ability of evaluating, applying, and synthesizing technical, aesthetic, and ethical dimensions of architectural knowledge with a scientific and critical approach, ensuring feasible and sustainable outcomes. | H | Project |
| 3) | A competence to analyze historical, cultural, and theoretical contexts of architectural works and environments while fostering an intellectual perspective for critical engagement with global and local issues. | N | |
| 4) | A skill in effectively utilizing analog and digital tools, including freehand sketches, digital modeling, and graphical representation techniques, to clearly articulate architectural ideas and processes to a range of audiences. | S | Project |
| 5) | An awareness of and commitment to ethical principles and professional responsibilities by addressing societal needs, promoting environmental sustainability, respecting cultural diversity. | N | |
| 6) | An ability to conduct rigorous research, analyze and synthesize data, and apply theories, methods, and intellectual frameworks on design subjects. | N | |
| 7) | A commitment to collaborate effectively in interdisciplinary and multicultural environments, showcasing leadership and coordinating efforts among professionals involved in shaping the built environment. | N |
| Prepared by and Date | ŞEBNEM YÜCEL , March 2020 |
| Course Coordinator | AKTS1 |
| Semester | Spring |
| Name of Instructor |
| Week | Subject |
| 1) | Urban Analysis |
| 2) | Observation Record Reviews |
| 3) | Story Reviews |
| 4) | Design Work |
| 5) | Design Work |
| 6) | Mid-term Evaluation |
| 7) | Design Work (Mid term feed back integration) |
| 8) | Design Work (PROGRESS INTO A SYSTEM DESIGN W. PUBLIC AND RESTRICTED SPACES) |
| 9) | Design Work (PROGRESS INTO A SYSTEM DESIGN W. PUBLIC AND RESTRICTED SPACES) |
| 10) | Design Work (PROGRESS INTO A SYSTEM DESIGN W. PUBLIC AND RESTRICTED SPACES) |
| 11) | 2. Midterm Evaluation |
| 12) | Design Work (Midterm feedback integration) |
| 13) | Design Work |
| 14) | Design Work |
| 15) | Final Submission Work |
| 16) | Final Submission Work |
| Required/Recommended Readings | - | ||||||||||||
| Teaching Methods | The course follows the ‘Flipped classroom’ model, with the in-class studies and studio work. Each Friday at the end of the class students are expected to upload their weekly productions to the shared folder. | ||||||||||||
| Homework and Projects | 1 Group Work, 1 Individual Presentation, 2 Reviews and 1 Final Review | ||||||||||||
| Laboratory Work | - | ||||||||||||
| Computer Use | Yes | ||||||||||||
| Other Activities | Field Trips | ||||||||||||
| Assessment Methods |
|
||||||||||||
| Course Administration |
inceoglua@mef.edu.tr Arda İnceoğlu: Block A, Room 505 Student participation will be essential for the design studio. Attending both reviews including the Final Review are crucial elements in the final grade. Late submissions will not be accepted. 80% attendance is compulsory for a successful outcome. Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism: YÖK Disciplinary Regulation. |
||||||||||||
| Activity | No/Weeks | Hours | Calculation | ||||
| No/Weeks per Semester | Preparing for the Activity | Spent in the Activity Itself | Completing the Activity Requirements | ||||
| Presentations / Seminar | 14 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 280 | ||
| Project | 14 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 280 | ||
| Homework Assignments | 14 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 280 | ||
| Final Examination | 1 | 3 | 12 | 3 | 18 | ||
| Total Workload | 858 | ||||||
| Total Workload/25 | 34.3 | ||||||
| ECTS | 12 | ||||||