School/Faculty/Institute | Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences | |||||
Course Code | IR 202 | |||||
Course Title in English | International Relations Theory | |||||
Course Title in Turkish | Uluslararasi Iliskiler Kurami | |||||
Language of Instruction | EN | |||||
Type of Course | Flipped Classroom | |||||
Level of Course | Intermediate | |||||
Semester | Spring | |||||
Contact Hours per Week |
|
|||||
Estimated Student Workload | 128 hours per semester | |||||
Number of Credits | 5 ECTS | |||||
Grading Mode | Standard Letter Grade | |||||
Pre-requisites | None | |||||
Expected Prior Knowledge | None | |||||
Co-requisites | None | |||||
Registration Restrictions | Only undergraduate students | |||||
Overall Educational Objective | To learn the principal theoretical approaches to International Relations. | |||||
Course Description | IR 202 studies the main theoretical approaches to International Relations (IR). Topics include realism and its variants as well as liberal philosophy and more modern liberal theories ranging from regime theory, theories of interdependence, neo-liberal institutionalism to democratic peace theory. Economic structuralism, constructivism, the English School, critical theory and postmodernism are studied in the second half of the course. | |||||
Course Description in Turkish |
Course Learning Outcomes and CompetencesUpon successful completion of the course, the learner is expected to be able to:1) Identify and describe the main arguments of the principal theories of International Relations. 2) Differentiate the various theories of International Relations in terms of their explanations regarding the nature of the international system and IR. 3) Critically appraise the key texts that have shaped the development of international relations theory. 4) Assess the strengths and weaknesses of each theoretical approach in international relations. 5) Apply different theoretical approaches to the analysis of events in international relations. 6) Evaluate international relations theories from a scientific perspective. |
Program Learning Outcomes/Course Learning Outcomes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1) Thorough knowledge of the major concepts, theoretical perspectives, empirical findings, and historical trends in psychology. | ||||||
2) Understanding of and ability to apply essential research methods in psychology, including research design, data analysis, and data interpretation. | ||||||
3) Competence to use critical and creative thinking, skeptical inquiry and a scientific approach to solving problems related to behavior and mental processes. | ||||||
4) Understanding and ability to apply psychological principles, skills and values in personal, social, and organizational contexts. | ||||||
5) Ability to weigh evidence, to tolerate ambiguity, and to reflect other values that underpin psychology as a discipline. | ||||||
6) Internalization and dissemination of professional ethical standards. | ||||||
7) Demonstration of competence in information technologies, and the ability to use computer and other technologies for purposes related to the pursuit of knowledge in psychology and the broader social sciences. | ||||||
8) Skills to communicate the knowledge of psychological science effectively, in a variety of formats, in both Turkish and in English (in English, at least CEFR B2 level). | ||||||
9) Recognition, understanding, and respect for the complexity of sociocultural and international diversity. | ||||||
10) Recognition for the need for, and the skills to pursue, lifelong learning, inquiry, and self-improvement. | ||||||
11) Ability to formulate critical hypotheses based on psychological theory and literature, and design studies to test those hypotheses. | ||||||
12) Ability to acquire knowledge independently, and to plan one’s own learning. | ||||||
13) Demonstration of advanced competence in the clarity and composition of written work and presentations. |
N None | S Supportive | H Highly Related |
Program Outcomes and Competences | Level | Assessed by | |
1) | Thorough knowledge of the major concepts, theoretical perspectives, empirical findings, and historical trends in psychology. | N | |
2) | Understanding of and ability to apply essential research methods in psychology, including research design, data analysis, and data interpretation. | N | |
3) | Competence to use critical and creative thinking, skeptical inquiry and a scientific approach to solving problems related to behavior and mental processes. | H | Exam,HW,Participation |
4) | Understanding and ability to apply psychological principles, skills and values in personal, social, and organizational contexts. | N | |
5) | Ability to weigh evidence, to tolerate ambiguity, and to reflect other values that underpin psychology as a discipline. | N | |
6) | Internalization and dissemination of professional ethical standards. | N | |
7) | Demonstration of competence in information technologies, and the ability to use computer and other technologies for purposes related to the pursuit of knowledge in psychology and the broader social sciences. | N | |
8) | Skills to communicate the knowledge of psychological science effectively, in a variety of formats, in both Turkish and in English (in English, at least CEFR B2 level). | N | |
9) | Recognition, understanding, and respect for the complexity of sociocultural and international diversity. | S | Participation |
10) | Recognition for the need for, and the skills to pursue, lifelong learning, inquiry, and self-improvement. | S | HW,Participation |
11) | Ability to formulate critical hypotheses based on psychological theory and literature, and design studies to test those hypotheses. | N | |
12) | Ability to acquire knowledge independently, and to plan one’s own learning. | S | Exam,HW |
13) | Demonstration of advanced competence in the clarity and composition of written work and presentations. | H | Exam,HW |
Prepared by and Date | BEKEN SAATÇİOĞLU , January 2024 |
Course Coordinator | BEKEN SAATÇİOĞLU |
Semester | Spring |
Name of Instructor | Prof. Dr. BEKEN SAATÇİOĞLU |
Week | Subject |
1) | Course Introduction |
2) | Chapter 1, Thinking about IR Theory (p. 1-37). |
3) | Chapter 2, Realism: The State and Balance of Power (p. 37-52, p. 81-91). |
4) | Chapter 2, Realism: The State and Balance of Power (p. 52-80), “Explaining War: The Levels of Analysis” (p. 94-107), “Hard and Soft Power in American Foreign Policy” (p. 107-115). |
5) | Chapter 3, Liberalism: Interdependence and Global Governance (p. 127-150). |
6) | Chapter 3, Liberalism: Interdependence and Global Governance (p. 150-164), “Producing Security” (p. 165-172). |
7) | Chapter 4, “Economic Structuralism: Global Capitalism and Postcolonialism” (p. 187-216), “The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy” (p. 225-231). |
8) | Midterm |
9) | Chapter 7, “Constructivist Understandings” (p. 313-344). |
10) | Chapter 7, “Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention” (p. 345-352); Jeffrey Checkel “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change”, International Organization, vol. 55 no. 3, 2001, p. 553-588. |
11) | Chapter 5, “The English School: International Society and Grotian Rationalism” (p. 237-267). |
12) | Chapter 6, “Positivism, Critical Theory, and Postmodern Understandings” (p. 274-306). |
13) | Chapter 8, “Feminist Understandings in IR Theory” (p. 360- 385). |
14) | Conclusion and review |
15) | Final Examination Period |
Required/Recommended Readings | • Textbook: Paul R. Viotti and Mark V. Kauppi, International Relations Theory, Pearson New International Edition, Fifth Edition (Pearson, 2014). • Jeffrey Checkel “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change”, International Organization, vol. 55 no. 3, 2001, p. 553-588. | ||||||||||||||||||
Teaching Methods | Lectures, class discussion, group work, course videos. | ||||||||||||||||||
Homework and Projects | None. | ||||||||||||||||||
Laboratory Work | None. | ||||||||||||||||||
Computer Use | Yes. | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Activities | None. | ||||||||||||||||||
Assessment Methods |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Course Administration |
beken.saatcioglu@mef.edu.tr 02123953678 Rules for attendance: Attendance is not mandatory, though highly necessary. Students are not graded based on class attendance alone but they are expected to attend regularly and are graded based on class participation. Missing a quiz: Missed quizzes cannot be made up. Missing a midterm: All students must take the midterm on the scheduled date. If they miss the exam due to illness, they must provide valid documentation in the form of an official doctor’s report. Missing a final: Faculty regulations. A reminder of proper classroom behavior, code of student conduct: YÖK Regulations Statement on plagiarism: YÖK Regulations (http://3fcampus.mef.edu.tr/uploads/cms/webadmin.mef.edu.tr/4833_2.pdf ) Plagiarism and cheating will be treated according to the university’s regulations. Students caught cheating and plagiarizing will be reported to the Dean and risk facing further disciplinary action. |
Activity | No/Weeks | Hours | Calculation | ||||
No/Weeks per Semester | Preparing for the Activity | Spent in the Activity Itself | Completing the Activity Requirements | ||||
Course Hours | 14 | 2 | 2 | 56 | |||
Quiz(zes) | 4 | 4 | 0.5 | 18 | |||
Midterm(s) | 1 | 24 | 2 | 26 | |||
Final Examination | 1 | 28 | 2 | 30 | |||
Total Workload | 130 | ||||||
Total Workload/25 | 5.2 | ||||||
ECTS | 5 |