School/Faculty/Institute | Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences | ||||
Course Code | IR 226 | ||||
Course Title in English | Foreign Policy Analysis | ||||
Course Title in Turkish | Dış Politika Analizi | ||||
Language of Instruction | EN | ||||
Type of Course | Flipped Classroom | ||||
Level of Course | Intermediate | ||||
Semester | Spring | ||||
Contact Hours per Week |
|
||||
Estimated Student Workload | 135 hours per semester | ||||
Number of Credits | 5 ECTS | ||||
Grading Mode | Standard Letter Grade | ||||
Pre-requisites | None | ||||
Co-requisites | None | ||||
Expected Prior Knowledge | None | ||||
Registration Restrictions | Only Undergraduate Students | ||||
Overall Educational Objective | • To understand the central concepts in foreign policy analysis; • To apply students’ skills of analysis on differing foreign policies in practice; • To create critical engagement with the foreign policy analysis literature with different levels; • To learn the skills to synthesize theory and practice to present and conduct their analysis. | ||||
Course Description | This course concentrates particularly on the process of decision making, the internal and external factors which influence foreign policy decisions, the instruments available to foreign policy decision makers and the effect of changes in the international system on foreign policy. Every week is dedicated to a different framework of foreign policy analysis. Thus, it will guide the students through the conventional level of analysis structure, by introducing systemic, state and individual level of analysis that shape foreign policy of a state. The course combines a discussion of this theoretical framework with their application to appropriate case studies. In doing this, it examines the primary sources of constraints and preferences on foreign policy decision-making process with respect to specific examples. |
Course Learning Outcomes and CompetencesUpon successful completion of the course, the learner is expected to be able to:1) Dış politika karar alma sürecine dahil olan süreçleri belirlemek ve değerlendirmek 2) Dış politika yapıcıların uğraşmak zorunda olduğu bağlamları, baskıları ve kısıtlamaları analiz etmek 3) Dış politika analizinde kullanılan farklı yaklaşımların gücünü anlamak 4) Dış politikaya ilişkin teorik literatürü değerlendirmek ve kendi araştırmasını yapmak |
Program Learning Outcomes/Course Learning Outcomes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1) Mühendislik, bilim ve matematik prensiplerini uygulayarak karmaşık mühendislik problemlerini tanımlama, formüle etme ve çözme becerisi | ||||
2) Halk sağlığı, güvenlik ve refahın yanı sıra, küresel, kültürel, sosyal, çevresel ve ekonomik faktörleri dikkate alarak, ihtiyaçları karşılayan çözümler üretmek için mühendislik tasarımını uygulama becerisi | ||||
3) Farklı kitlelerle etkili bir şekilde iletişim kurma becerisi | ||||
4) Mühendislik durumlarında etik ve profesyonel sorumlulukları tanıma ve mühendislik çözümlerinin küresel, ekonomik, çevresel ve toplumsal etkilerini göz önünde bulundurarak bilinçli kararlar verme becerisi | ||||
5) Takım üyeleriyle birlikte liderlik sağlayan, işbirlikçi ve kapsayıcı bir ortam oluşturan, hedefler belirleyen, görevleri planlayan ve hedeflere ulaşan bir ekipte etkili bir şekilde çalışma becerisi | ||||
6) Uygun deneyler geliştirme ve yürütme, verileri analiz etme ve yorumlama ve mühendislik değerlendirmesi yaparak sonuçlara ulaşma becerisi | ||||
7) Gerekli olduğunda yeni bilgileri edinme ve uygun öğrenme stratejilerini kullanarak bu bilgileri uygulama becerisi |
N None | S Supportive | H Highly Related |
Program Outcomes and Competences | Level | Assessed by | |
1) | Mühendislik, bilim ve matematik prensiplerini uygulayarak karmaşık mühendislik problemlerini tanımlama, formüle etme ve çözme becerisi | N | |
2) | Halk sağlığı, güvenlik ve refahın yanı sıra, küresel, kültürel, sosyal, çevresel ve ekonomik faktörleri dikkate alarak, ihtiyaçları karşılayan çözümler üretmek için mühendislik tasarımını uygulama becerisi | N | |
3) | Farklı kitlelerle etkili bir şekilde iletişim kurma becerisi | S | Derse Katılım |
4) | Mühendislik durumlarında etik ve profesyonel sorumlulukları tanıma ve mühendislik çözümlerinin küresel, ekonomik, çevresel ve toplumsal etkilerini göz önünde bulundurarak bilinçli kararlar verme becerisi | N | |
5) | Takım üyeleriyle birlikte liderlik sağlayan, işbirlikçi ve kapsayıcı bir ortam oluşturan, hedefler belirleyen, görevleri planlayan ve hedeflere ulaşan bir ekipte etkili bir şekilde çalışma becerisi | H | Derse Katılım,Sunum |
6) | Uygun deneyler geliştirme ve yürütme, verileri analiz etme ve yorumlama ve mühendislik değerlendirmesi yaparak sonuçlara ulaşma becerisi | N | |
7) | Gerekli olduğunda yeni bilgileri edinme ve uygun öğrenme stratejilerini kullanarak bu bilgileri uygulama becerisi | H | Sınav,Derse Katılım,Sunum |
Prepared by and Date | CANSU GÜLEÇ , December 2023 |
Course Coordinator | CANSU GÜLEÇ |
Semester | Spring |
Name of Instructor | Arş. Gör. CANSU GÜLEÇ |
Hafta | Konu |
1) | Giriş-Dış Politika Analizi |
2) | Dış Politikayı Analiz Etmek |
3) | Dış Politika Analizinin Tarihi ve Gelişimi |
4) | Dış Politika Analizinde Analiz Düzeyleri |
5) | Birey Düzeyinde Analiz |
6) | Devlet Düzeyinde Analiz |
7) | Devlet Düzeyinde Analiz |
8) | Ara Sınav |
9) | Sistem Düzeyinde Analiz |
10) | Propaganda ve Kamu Diplomasisi |
11) | Medya ve Kamuoyu |
12) | Güvenlik Politikaları |
13) | Vaka Çalışması |
14) | Vaka Çalışması |
15) | Final Sınavı Dönemi |
16) | Final Sınavı Dönemi |
Required/Recommended Readings | There is no textbook for this course. Instead, students will be assigned chapters from academic books and articles. Additional short readings may be assigned throughout the course. These assignments will be announced through Blackboard. The students are responsible for checking Blackboard regularly. Readings are as follows: Subject: Introduction- Foreign Policy Analysis Reading: This syllabus. Carefully. Subject: Analyzing Foreign Policy Reading: • “The Nature of Foreign policy” in Abdul Aziz Said and Charles O. Lerche eds., Concepts of International Politics in Global Perspective, (Prentice Hall, 1995): 21-36. • Keith R. Legg and James F. Morrison, “The Formulation of foreign policy objectives”, in Richard Little and Michael Smith eds., Perspectives on World Politics, (Routledge, 1991): 59-68. Subject: The History and Evolution of Foreign Policy Analysis Reading: • Deborah J. Gerner, “The Evolution of Study of Foreign Policy”, in Laura Neack, Jeanne A. K. Hey and Patrick J. Haney eds., Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1995): 17-32. • Valerie M. Hudson, “Chapter 1: Introduction: The Situation and Evolution of Foreign Policy Analysis: A Road Map” in Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory Second Ed., (Rowman& Littlefield Publishers, 2014): 3-35. Subject: Levels of Analysis in Foreign Policy Analysis Reading: • Marijke Breuning, Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction, (Palgrave Macmillan, 2007): 1-25. • J. David Singer, “The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations”, World Politics, Vol. 14, No. 1, The International System: Theoretical Essays. (Oct., 1961): 77-92. Subject: Individual Level of Analysis Reading: • Janice Gross Stein, “Chapter 6: Foreign Policy Decision Making: Rational, Psychological and Neurological Models”, in Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield and Tim Dunne eds., Foreign Policy Theories, Actors, Cases, (Oxford University Press, 2008): 101-116. • Derek Beach, “Understanding the Choice Situation”, in Analyzing Foreign Policy, (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012): 97-116. Subject: State Level of Analysis Reading: • Valerie M. Hudson, “Chapter 3: Group Decision Making: Small Group Dynamics, Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Models” in Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory Second Edition, (Rowman& Littlefield Publishers, 2014): 73-116. Subject: State Level of Analysis Reading: • Valerie M. Hudson, “Chapter 5: Domestic Politics and Opposition” in Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory Second Edition, (Rowman& Littlefield Publishers, 2014): 141-160. Subject: International System Level of Analysis Reading: • Valerie M. Hudson, “Chapter 6: The Levels of National Attributes and International System”, in Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory Second Edition, (Rowman& Littlefield Publishers, 2014): 161-182. • Laura Neck, “The International System Level of Analysis” in Studying Foreign Policy Comparatively Cases and Analysis Fourth edition, (Rowmann & Littlefield, 2018): 140-160. Subject: Propaganda and Public Diplomacy Reading: • Alan Chong, “Soft Power”, in Foreign Policy in Global Information Space Actualizing Soft Power, (Pelgrave Macmillan, 2007): 58-81 • Philip M. Taylor, “Propaganda, Cold War and the Advent of the Television Age” in Munitions of the Mind: A history of propaganda from the ancient world to the present era Third Edition, (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003): 249-282. Subject: Media and Public Opinion Reading: • Laura Neck, “Public Opinion and Media” in Studying Foreign Policy Comparatively Cases and Analysis Fourth edition, (Rowmann & Littlefield, 2018): 117-135. Subject: Security Policies Reading: • Derek Beach, “Chapter 6: Security Policies”, in Analyzing Foreign Policy, (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012): 151-171. Case Study: Cuban Missile Crisis Reading: • Graham T. Allison, The Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, (Little Brown Company, 1971). Case Study Reading: • Melvyn P. Leffler, “9/11 and the Past and Future of American Foreign Policy”, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), Vol. 79, No. 5 (Oct., 2003): 1045-1063 • David Mitchell and Tansa George Massoud, “Anatomy of Failure: Bush's Decision-Making Process and the Iraq War”, Foreign Policy Analysis, Volume 5, Issue 3, 1 (July 2009): 265–286 • Barış Kesgin and Juliet Karboo, “When and How Parliaments Influence Foreign Policy: The Case of Turkey’s Iraq Decision”, International Studies Perspectives 11 (2010):19-36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Teaching Methods | Lectures as well as the reading material to be assigned by Instructor will constitute the main source of information for the students. As a part of flipped learning model, students have to use blackboard actively, complete pre-class exercises and participate in class discussion. | ||||||||||||||||||
Homework and Projects | Homework assignments will be submitted by Blackboard. | ||||||||||||||||||
Laboratory Work | None | ||||||||||||||||||
Computer Use | None | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Activities | None | ||||||||||||||||||
Assessment Methods |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Course Administration |
gulecc@mef.edu.tr : (212) 395 3610 MEF University values academic integrity. Therefore, all students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the code of student conduct and disciplinary procedures. Any improper behavior, academic dishonesty or plagiarism is subject to the YÖK Disciplinary Regulation. Within the framework of MEF University's Artificial Intelligence Policy, it is aimed to integrate artificial intelligence into educational processes and promote its ethical use. The full text of the policy document can be accessed here: https://www.mef.edu.tr/tr/duyurular/mef-universitesi-yapay-zeka-politikasi-v2-yayimlandi |
Activity | No/Weeks | Hours | Calculation | ||||
No/Weeks per Semester | Preparing for the Activity | Spent in the Activity Itself | Completing the Activity Requirements | ||||
Ders Saati | 14 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 98 | ||
Sunum / Seminer | 1 | 8 | 1 | 9 | |||
Ara Sınavlar | 1 | 8 | 2 | 10 | |||
Final | 1 | 16 | 2 | 18 | |||
Total Workload | 135 | ||||||
Total Workload/25 | 5.4 | ||||||
ECTS | 5 |