Information Package / Course Catalogue
HUK 672 Appeal in Criminal Cases
MEF University
Degree Programs
Public Law
General Information For Students
Diploma SupplementErasmus Policy Statement
Public Law
PhD Length of the Programme: 4 Number of Credits: 240 TR-NQF-HE: Level 8 QF-EHEA: Third Cycle EQF: Level 8

Ders Genel Tanıtım Bilgileri

School/Faculty/Institute Graduate School
Course Code HUK 672
Course Title in English Appeal in Criminal Cases
Course Title in Turkish Ceza Yargılamasında Temyiz Yolu
Language of Instruction TR
Type of Course Lecture
Level of Course Advanced
Semester Spring,Fall
Contact Hours per Week
Lecture: 3 Recitation: Lab: Other:
Estimated Student Workload 188 hours per semester
Number of Credits 7.5 ECTS
Grading Mode Standard Letter Grade
Pre-requisites None
Expected Prior Knowledge -
Co-requisites None
Registration Restrictions Doctoral Students Only
Overall Educational Objective To teach the way of appeal, which is the last degree review in criminal proceedings
Course Description The concept and nature of criminal appeal, those who have the right to appeal, conditions to file an appeal case, appeal trial at the Turkish Court of Cassation, actions taken and decisions that can be rendered by the Court of Cassation during the appeal review, status of the first instance court and the Regional Court of Appeals after the decision by the Court of Cassation will be examined in this course.
Course Description in Turkish Temyiz kavramı ve niteliği, temyiz yoluna başvurma hakkı bulunanlar, temyiz davası açma koşulları, Yargıtay’da temyiz yargılamasının yapılması, Yargıtay tarafından temyiz incelemesi sırasında yapılan işlemler ve verilebilecek kararlar, Yargıtay’ın kararından sonra ilk derece ve Bölge Adliye Mahkemesinin durumu incelenecektir.

Course Learning Outcomes and Competences

Upon successful completion of the course, the learner is expected to be able to:
1) To teach the legal remedy of appeal against the final judgements/decisions of the courts of first instance and regional courts of appeal
2) to raise awareness of how the judge of the Court of Cassation, as the judge of the judgement, supervises/reviewed the reasoning of the judgement
3) Explain how the Court of Cassation fulfils its duties of ensuring discipline in reasoning and training first instance/regional court of appeal judges through its reasoned review
Program Learning Outcomes/Course Learning Outcomes 1 2 3
1) *
2) *
3) *
4) *
5) *
6) *
7) *
8) *
9) *
10) *
11) *
12) *
13) *

Relation to Program Outcomes and Competences

N None S Supportive H Highly Related
     
Program Outcomes and Competences Level Assessed by
1) * H HW,Presentation
2) * H HW,Presentation
3) * H HW,Presentation
4) * S HW,Presentation
5) * S HW,Presentation
6) * S HW,Presentation
7) * S HW,Presentation
8) * S HW,Presentation
9) * S HW,Presentation
10) * N
11) * S HW,Presentation
12) * S HW,Presentation
13) * S HW,Presentation
Prepared by and Date ALİ RIZA ÇINAR , February 2024
Course Coordinator AKTS1
Semester Spring,Fall
Name of Instructor Prof. Dr. ALİ RIZA ÇINAR

Course Contents

Week Subject
1) General information on remedies
2) Basic information about the appellate procedure, the development of the appellate procedure and the establishment of the court of appeal
3) Legal regulation, subject matter of appeal proceedings, appealable and non-appealable decisions, grounds and types of appeal
4) Conditions for filing an appeal
5) The effects of the way of appeal, stating the grounds of appeal, the court that rendered the judgement investigating the conditions of appeal, notification of the petition of appeal and taking the opinions of the parties
6) Appeal proceedings at the Court of Cassation
7) Appeal proceedings at the Court of Cassation
8) Appeal proceedings at the Court of Cassation
9) The status of the court of first instance and the regional court of appeal after the decisions of the Court of Cassation
10) The status of the court of first instance and the regional court of appeal after the decisions of the Court of Cassation
11) Review of judicial decisions
12) Review of judicial decisions
13) Homework follow-up
14) Homework follow-up
15) Presentation
16) Presentation
Required/Recommended ReadingsAli Rıza ÇINAR, Ceza Yargılamasında Temyiz Yolu Fidan BALCI – Seyithan ÖZTÜRK, Ceza Yargılamasında İstinaf ve Temyiz Mustafa Ruhan ERDEM – Candide ŞENTÜRK, Ceza Muhakemesinde Kanun Yolları Nur CENTEL – Hamide ZAFER, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku Feridun YENİSEY – Ayşe NUHOĞLU, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku Ders Kitabı Bahri ÖZTÜRK (Editör), Nazari ve Uygulamalı Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku Ders Kitabı Yener ÜNVER- Hakan HAKERİ, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku Veli Özer ÖZBEK – Koray DOĞAN – Pınar BACAKSIZ, Türk Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku Doğan SOYASLAN, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku Nevzat TOROSLU – Metin FEYZİOĞLU, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku Cumhur ŞAHİN – Neslihan GÖKTÜRK, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku – I Cumhur ŞAHİN – Neslihan GÖKTÜRK, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku – II *The latest editions of all books are recommended.
Teaching MethodsLecture, decision review, homework and presentation
Homework and Projects
Laboratory Work
Computer Use
Other Activities
Assessment Methods
Assessment Tools Count Weight
Homework Assignments 1 % 60
Presentation 1 % 40
TOTAL % 100
Course Administration cinarr@mef.edu.tr

Ödevlerin zamanında teslim edilmemesi ve sunuma ilişkin yükümlülüklerin mazeretsiz yerine getirilmemesi halinde öğrenci değerlendirmeye alınmayacaktır. Disiplin soruşturmasının gerektiği durumlarda YÖK Öğrenci Disiplin Yönetmeliği uygulanacaktır.

ECTS Student Workload Estimation

Activity No/Weeks Hours Calculation
No/Weeks per Semester Preparing for the Activity Spent in the Activity Itself Completing the Activity Requirements
Course Hours 14 4 3 2 126
Presentations / Seminar 1 30 2 32
Homework Assignments 1 30 30
Total Workload 188
Total Workload/25 7.5
ECTS 7.5