HUK 551 Procedural Aspects And Right to a Fair Trial in Competition LawMEF UniversityDegree Programs Public Law (Thesis)General Information For StudentsDiploma SupplementErasmus Policy Statement
Public Law (Thesis)
Master Length of the Programme: 2 Number of Credits: 120 TR-NQF-HE: Level 7 QF-EHEA: Second Cycle EQF: Level 7

Ders Genel Tanıtım Bilgileri

School/Faculty/Institute Graduate School
Course Code HUK 551
Course Title in English Procedural Aspects And Right to a Fair Trial in Competition Law
Course Title in Turkish Rekabet Hukukunda Usul ve Adil Yargılanma Hakkı
Language of Instruction TR
Type of Course Flipped Classroom,Lecture
Level of Course Advanced
Semester Spring
Contact Hours per Week
Lecture: 2 Recitation: Lab: Other:
Estimated Student Workload 138 hours per semester
Number of Credits 6 ECTS
Grading Mode Standard Letter Grade
Pre-requisites None
Expected Prior Knowledge Basic knowledge of Constitutional Law, Administrative Law and Competition Law.
Co-requisites None
Registration Restrictions Graduate Students Only
Overall Educational Objective Developing competences in the field of Competition Law
Course Description It is aimed to address the procedural and fair trial issues that students who intend to work in the field of Competition Law, which has been very popular recently, will need a lot in practice, primarily from a theoretical perspective and to develop students' competencies in the field of Competition Law by focusing in detail on examples from practice. The intersection of Competition Law with Administrative Law, Constitutional Law and the right to a fair trial will be discussed.
Course Description in Turkish Son zamanlarda oldukça popüler olan Rekabet Hukuku alanında çalışmayı düşünen öğrencilerin uygulamada çokça ihtiyaç duyacakları usul ve adil yargılanma meseleleri öncelikle teorik perspektifle ele almak ve uygulamadan örnekler üzerinde detaylı olarak durularak öğrencilerin Rekabet Hukuku alanındaki yetkinliklerinin geliştirilmesi hedeflenmektedir. Rekabet Hukukunun İdare Hukuku, Anayasa Hukuku ve adil yargılanma hakkıyla kesiştiği konular ele alınacaktır.

Course Learning Outcomes and Competences

Upon successful completion of the course, the learner is expected to be able to:
1) Understands the basic procedural issues in disputes arising in the field of Competition Law.
2) Evaluate the violations of fair trial and other fundamental rights that may arise in Competition Law disputes.
3) Analyse the relationship between Competition Law and Constitutional and Administrative Law.
Program Learning Outcomes/Course Learning Outcomes 1 2 3
1) An enhancement of the theoretical and practical skills obtained during the undergraduate degree for the subjects within the domain of public law.
2) An updated knowledge of developments in jurisprudence and legislation.
3) An ability to diagnose sources of legal disputes in the domain of public law, and to apply rules and regulations for solving these disputes.
4) A capability to critically analyse existing regulations and theory and to propose new insights to old and new problems occurring in the domain of public law.
5) An ability to describe processes and theories both verbally and in writing on national and international platforms within the field of public law.
6) An awareness of social, scientific and ethical values regarding public law field all related professional activities.
7) An ability to communicate in English both verbally and in writing at European Language Portfolio General Level B2.
8) An understanding of social and environmental aspects of legislative and jurisprudential measures and theories.

Relation to Program Outcomes and Competences

N None S Supportive H Highly Related
     
Program Outcomes and Competences Level Assessed by
1) An enhancement of the theoretical and practical skills obtained during the undergraduate degree for the subjects within the domain of public law. S Exam,Participation,Presentation
2) An updated knowledge of developments in jurisprudence and legislation. S Exam,Participation,Presentation
3) An ability to diagnose sources of legal disputes in the domain of public law, and to apply rules and regulations for solving these disputes. H Exam,Participation,Presentation
4) A capability to critically analyse existing regulations and theory and to propose new insights to old and new problems occurring in the domain of public law. H Exam,Participation,Presentation
5) An ability to describe processes and theories both verbally and in writing on national and international platforms within the field of public law. H Exam,Participation,Presentation
6) An awareness of social, scientific and ethical values regarding public law field all related professional activities. S Exam,Participation,Presentation
7) An ability to communicate in English both verbally and in writing at European Language Portfolio General Level B2. N
8) An understanding of social and environmental aspects of legislative and jurisprudential measures and theories. S Exam,Participation,Presentation
Prepared by and Date , February 2024
Course Coordinator AKTS1
Semester Spring
Name of Instructor Asst. Prof. Dr. SERTAÇ SERTER

Course Contents

Week Subject
1) General introduction on why such a course is needed / ECHR & domestic law relationship / The fact that the Competition Board is bound by ECHR & ECtHR case law
2) ECtHR / CJEU relationship / The Vlaamse Balies judgement of the CJEU and its reflection on Turkish law
3) The importance of the correct application of the ECHR & ECtHR case law / Examples of bad practices based on the decision of the Ankara 9th Administrative Court on EKC Logistics
4) Differences between regulatory fines and misdemeanour fines / The Council of State and the Competition Board's acceptance of administrative fines imposed as a result of on-site inspections as misdemeanour fines rather than regulatory fines and the consequences of this
5) ECtHR's view on de facto presumptions / Examples of de facto presumptions that reverse the burden of proof applied by the Competition Board and are very difficult or impossible to prove (in particular, the presumption of the natural course of life and the deletion of WhatsApp/e-mail correspondence during on-site examinations as prevention/difficulty of on-site examination regardless of the content)
6) ECtHR's view on de facto presumptions / Examples of de facto presumptions that reverse the burden of proof applied by the Competition Board and are very difficult or impossible to prove (in particular, the presumption of the natural course of life and the deletion of WhatsApp/e-mail correspondence during on-site examinations as prevention/difficulty of on-site examination regardless of the content) (CONTINUED)
7) The Competition Board's approach of "evaluating the evidence as a whole" and its approach to reasoned decision-making, presumption of innocence
8) The Competition Board's approach of "evaluating the evidence as a whole" and the view of this approach against basic fair trial elements such as reasoned decision-making and presumption of innocence (CONTINUED)
9) Equality of arms, the right to adversarial proceedings and the right to defence in the face of issues such as the Competition Board's briefing practice, the Competition Board's decision against the Competition Board on issues that the rapporteurs deem favourable
10) Keeping oral defence periods short / Hearing Officer institution in the European Union
11) Violation in the final decision on a matter that was not informed during the preliminary investigation/investigation process and its relation with the substitution of reason in Administrative Law
12) The importance of authority in Administrative Law / Participation of assistant experts in on-site examinations within the scope of the element of authority and the Competition Board's appointment of the Presidency for the selection of rapporteurs in violation of Law No. 4054
13) The institution of omission in Administrative Law / The Competition Board's omission of regulations issued by other legal entities and examples from practice
14) A summary of the period based on the Competition Board's approach that "If there is a violation of fair trial, the courts will handle it"
15) End of Term Evaluation
16) End of Term Evaluation
Required/Recommended ReadingsTurkish and English resources will be sent to the students after the first week to read before the following lesson.
Teaching MethodsLecture, discussion, analyses of sample decisions and petitions
Homework and Projects
Laboratory Work
Computer Use
Other Activities
Assessment Methods
Assessment Tools Count Weight
Homework Assignments 1 % 60
Presentation 1 % 40
TOTAL % 100
Course Administration

Derse haftalık okumaların yapılarak gelinmesi beklenilmektedir. Ödevler hazırlanırken akademik yazım kurallarına dikkat edilmesi gerekmektedir. Derste kayıt almak yasaktır. Etik kurallara aykırılık ve intihale müsamaha gösterilmez ve bu durumların tespiti halinde öğrenci dersten başarısız olur. Ayrıca durum Enstitü’ye bildirilir. Kopya çekmek veya çektirmek ve intihal yapmak 2547 Sayılı Yüksek Öğretim Kanunu’nun 54. Maddesi’ne tabi olacaktır.

ECTS Student Workload Estimation

Activity No/Weeks Hours Calculation
No/Weeks per Semester Preparing for the Activity Spent in the Activity Itself Completing the Activity Requirements
Course Hours 14 2 2 2 84
Presentations / Seminar 1 10 2 2 14
Homework Assignments 1 40 40
Total Workload 138
Total Workload/25 5.5
ECTS 6