| School/Faculty/Institute |
Graduate School |
| Course Code |
HUK 682 |
| Course Title in English |
ConstititutionalCourt and EuropeanCourt ofHumanRights:ComparativeIndividualApplicationProceduralLaw |
| Course Title in Turkish |
Anayasa Mahkemesi ve İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi: Karşılaştırmalı Bireysel Başvuru Usul Hukuku |
| Language of Instruction |
TR |
| Type of Course |
Flipped Classroom |
| Level of Course |
Seçiniz |
| Semester |
Fall |
| Contact Hours per Week |
| Lecture: 3 |
Recitation: |
Lab: |
Other: |
|
| Estimated Student Workload |
188 hours per semester |
| Number of Credits |
7.5 ECTS |
| Grading Mode |
Standard Letter Grade
|
| Pre-requisites |
None |
| Expected Prior Knowledge |
None |
| Co-requisites |
None |
| Registration Restrictions |
None |
| Overall Educational Objective |
With this course, it is aimed to instruct students to learn the procedural rules of the individual application mechanism to the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights comparatively. |
| Course Description |
In this course, procedural aspects of the individual application to Constitutional Court and European Court of Human Rights are discussed comparatively. In this context, the following topics will be discussed: principles of subsidiary, Court’s jurisdiction regarding ratione personae, ratione loci, raitone matarae and ratione temporis, exhaustion of domestic remedies and its exceptions and time limit (30 days/four months rule), other admissibility criterion, pilot judgments, consequences of a judgement finding violation, enforcement of the judgments. |
| Course Description in Turkish |
Bu ders kapsamında, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi ve Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru sisteminin usul yönü karşılaştırmalı olarak ele alınmaktadır. Bu çerçevede, ele alınacak başlıklardan bazıları şunlardır: İkincillik ilkesi, Mahkemelerin kişi, konu, yer ve zaman bakımından yetkileri, iç hukuk yollarının tüketilmesi ve istisnaları, başvuru süresi (30 gün/4 ay), diğer kabul edilebilirlik koşulları, pilot kararlar, ihlal kararlarının sonuçları, kararların uygulanması |
Course Learning Outcomes and Competences
Upon successful completion of the course, the learner is expected to be able to:
1) Upon successful completion of the course, students are expected to
1. compare and evaluate the functioning of the mechanism of individual application to the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights.
2) Upon successful completion of the course, students are expected to:
2. Understand and interpret the similarities and differences of both systems.
3) Upon successful completion of the course, students are expected to:
3. Understand the importance of the individual application system within the right to legal remedies.
4) Upon successful completion of the course, students are expected to
4. Prepares a petition for individual application.
|
| Program Learning Outcomes/Course Learning Outcomes |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
| 1) * |
|
|
|
|
| 2) * |
|
|
|
|
| 3) * |
|
|
|
|
| 4) * |
|
|
|
|
| 5) * |
|
|
|
|
| 6) * |
|
|
|
|
| 7) * |
|
|
|
|
| 8) * |
|
|
|
|
| 9) * |
|
|
|
|
| 10) * |
|
|
|
|
| 11) * |
|
|
|
|
| 12) * |
|
|
|
|
| 13) * |
|
|
|
|
Relation to Program Outcomes and Competences
| N None |
S Supportive |
H Highly Related |
| |
|
|
| |
Program Outcomes and Competences |
Level |
Assessed by |
| 1) |
* |
S |
HW,Presentation
|
| 2) |
* |
H |
HW,Presentation
|
| 3) |
* |
S |
HW,Presentation
|
| 4) |
* |
S |
HW,Presentation
|
| 5) |
* |
S |
HW,Presentation
|
| 6) |
* |
S |
HW,Presentation
|
| 7) |
* |
H |
HW,Presentation
|
| 8) |
* |
H |
HW,Presentation
|
| 9) |
* |
S |
HW,Presentation
|
| 10) |
* |
N |
|
| 11) |
* |
N |
|
| 12) |
* |
S |
HW,Presentation
|
| 13) |
* |
S |
HW,Presentation
|
| Prepared by and Date |
BAŞAK ERDOĞAN , February 2024 |
| Course Coordinator |
AKTS1 |
| Semester |
Fall |
| Name of Instructor |
Prof. Dr. OSMAN KORKUT KANADOĞLU |
Course Contents
| Week |
Subject |
| 1) |
The process of Turkey's accession to the Convention and the recognition of the authority on individual application |
| 2) |
Recognition of the authority of the Constitutional Court to adjudicate on individual application |
| 3) |
Ratione personae |
| 4) |
Ratione materiae |
| 5) |
Ratione loci
|
| 6) |
Ratione temporis |
| 7) |
Admissibility: exhaustion of domestic remedies and its exceptions |
| 8) |
Admissibility: deadlines |
| 9) |
Admissibility: manifestly ill-founded, constitutional and personal importance/significant harm |
| 10) |
Decision: Compensation, renewal of proceedings |
| 11) |
Decision: individual and general injunction decisions |
| 12) |
Pilot decisions |
| 13) |
Presentations |
| 14) |
Presentations |
| 15) |
End of Term Exams |
| 16) |
End of Term Exams |
| Required/Recommended Readings | Abdulkadir Karaaslan, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuru Usulü ve Uygulama Sorunları, On İki Levha Yay., İstanbul 2020
Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos and Maria-Andriani Kostopoulou, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi Bağlamında Bireysel Başvuru: Usul Rehberi, Avrupa Konseyi 2021
Within the course weekly reading lists and decisions will also be provided.
|
| Teaching Methods | Lectures, evaluation of court decisions |
| Homework and Projects | |
| Laboratory Work | |
| Computer Use | |
| Other Activities | |
| Assessment Methods |
| Assessment Tools |
Count |
Weight |
| Homework Assignments |
1 |
% 30 |
| Paper Submission |
1 |
% 30 |
| Final Examination |
1 |
% 40 |
| TOTAL |
% 100 |
|
| Course Administration |
karacaoglue@mef.edu.tr
+902123953600
Ofis Saatleri: Randevu üzerine
Office Hours: Upon appointment |
Information Package / Course Catalogue