POLS 444 Philosophy of Social SciencesMEF ÜniversitesiAkademik Programlar Bilgisayar MühendisliğiÖğrenciler için Genel BilgiDiploma EkiErasmus Beyanı
Bilgisayar Mühendisliği
Lisans Programın Süresi: 4 Kredi Sayısı: 240 TYYÇ: 6. Düzey QF-EHEA: 1. Düzey EQF: 6. Düzey

Ders Genel Tanıtım Bilgileri

School/Faculty/Institute Faculty of Econ., Admin. and Social Sciences
Course Code POLS 444
Course Title in English Philosophy of Social Sciences
Course Title in Turkish Philosophy of Social Sciences
Language of Instruction EN
Type of Course Flipped Classroom
Level of Course Select
Semester Spring
Contact Hours per Week
Lecture: 3 Recitation: None Lab: None Other: None
Estimated Student Workload 120 hours per semester
Number of Credits 5 ECTS
Grading Mode Standard Letter Grade
Pre-requisites None
Expected Prior Knowledge None
Co-requisites None
Registration Restrictions Only Undergraduate Students
Overall Educational Objective To familiarize students with the basic philosophical problems and themes pertinent to social sciences
Course Description This course aims at questioning the nature of scientific reasoning; exploring the differences between natural and social science and looking into the specific problems of the social sciences. For the first couple of weeks, we will have a general introduction to the philosophy of science and scientific reasoning. After that, we will briefly look into the ideas of some of the most prominent theorists of science such as Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend. For the rest of the term, we will probe into the philosophy of social science via reading texts from eminent figures such as Max Weber, Emile Durkheim, Carl Hempel, Charles Taylor, Donald Davidson, William Dray, Harold Kincaid, Alan Nelson and others.
Course Description in Turkish Bu ders bilimsel akıl yürütmenin doğasını, doğa bilimleri ile sosyal bilimler arasındaki farkları ve sosyal bilimlerin Batı’da ortaya çıkışını inceler. İlk haftalarda bilimsel düşünce ve bilim felsefesine genel bir giriş yapılacaktır. Ardından Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, Imre Lakatos ve Paul Feyerabend gibi önde gelen bilim felsefecileri tanıtılacaktır. Dönemin geri kalanı boyunca Max Weber, Emile Durkheim, Carl Hempel, Charles Taylor, Donald Davidson, William Dray, Harold Kincaid ve Alan Nelson gibi önde gelen teorisyenlerin metinleri eşliğinde sosyal bilim felsefesi ve sosyal bilimlerin kendine has sorunları irdelenecektir.

Course Learning Outcomes and Competences

Upon successful completion of the course, the learner is expected to be able to:
1) Öğrenciler bilimsel akıl yürütmenin temel kriterlerini tanımlayabilecek
2) Öğrencier yöntem, yaklaşım ve değerler açısından doğa bilimleri ve sosyal bilimler arasında ayrım yapabilecekler
3) Öğrenciler önde gelen bilim felsefecilerinin farklı pozisyonlarını ana hatlarıyla açıklayabilecekler.
4) Öğrenciler sosyal bilimlerin temel felsefi sorunlarını ve temalarını analiz edebilecek.
Program Learning Outcomes/Course Learning Outcomes 1 2 3 4
1) An ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics
2) An ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors
3) An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences
4) An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts
5) An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives
6) An ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions
7) An ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies.

Relation to Program Outcomes and Competences

N None S Supportive H Highly Related
     
Program Outcomes and Competences Level Assessed by
1) An ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics N
2) An ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors N
3) An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences N
4) An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts H Exam
5) An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives N
6) An ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions N
7) An ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies. N
Prepared by and Date BAŞAK KEKİ , January 2024
Course Coordinator CANSU GÜLEÇ
Semester Spring
Name of Instructor Öğr. Gör. BAŞAK KEKİ

Course Contents

Hafta Konu
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)
Required/Recommended ReadingsThe coursepack will include excerpts from the following: Delanty, Gerard & Piet Styrdom. Philosophies of Social Science: The Classic and Contemporary Readings, (Philadelphia: Open University Press, 2003). Feyerabend, Paul. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, (New York: Verso, 2010). Godfrey-Smith, Peter. Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003). Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012). Lakatos, Imre. “Science and Pseudoscience”, http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/lehre/pmo/eng/Lakatos-Science.pdf Martin, Michael & Lee C. McIntyre. Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, (Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1996). Okasha, Samir. Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002). Popper, Karl R. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, (New York: Routledge, 2002). Rosenberg, Alexander. Philosophy of Social Science, (Colorado: Westview Press, 2016).
Teaching MethodsFlipped Learning technology – Perusall (texts will be uploaded pre-class with questions) -, in-class discussions, presentations, response papers
Homework and ProjectsPerusall questions, three response papers, presentations
Laboratory WorkNone
Computer UseNone
Other ActivitiesNone
Assessment Methods
Assessment Tools Count Weight
Devam 14 % 20
Sunum 1 % 20
Ara Sınavlar 1 % 30
Rapor Teslimi 3 % 30
TOTAL % 100
Course Administration

Email: kekib@mef.edu.tr Attendance and active participation are required. There would be no late presentations and papers unless medical report provided. MEF university values academic integrity. Therefore all students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the code of student conduct and disciplinary procedures. Any improper behavior, academic dishonesty or plagiarism is subject to the YÖK Disciplinary Regulation.

ECTS Student Workload Estimation

Activity No/Weeks Hours Calculation
No/Weeks per Semester Preparing for the Activity Spent in the Activity Itself Completing the Activity Requirements
Ders Saati 14 3 3 84
Sunum / Seminer 1 3 1 4
Ödevler 14 1 1 28
Rapor Teslimi 2 1 1 4
Total Workload 120
Total Workload/25 4.8
ECTS 5